As the conflict in Syria continues, so does the Iran-Saudi
proxy war in the Middle East. Several developments this week in the region highlighted
the growing tactics used by Iran and Saudi Arabia in fear of each other and the
Arab Spring.
Both Iran and the Saudis have a huge vested interest in
Syria. The Assad regime and its supporters, mainly Alawites (an offshoot of Shia
Islam), have enjoyed continuing support from Tehran. Syria has provided a
gateway for Iran into Lebanon and Hezbollah, and as a result an avenue to
destabilise Israel. It has also been known to use Syria as a ground for
training insurgents to fuel the Sunni-Shia sectarian violence in Iraq. The
Israelis are worried that with the collapse of the Syrian regime, the stockpile
of arms currently in the country will make their way to Hezbollah and leave the
Golan Heights open to al-Qaeda’s influence.
Such is Iran’s influence in Syria that it was able to
mediate the release of two Turkish journalists this week that had been captured
and held for two months while making a documentary of the uprising in the
country. Tehran and Ankara enjoy good trade relations, but Turkey’s economy,
especially in towns that border Syria, has been damaged by the uprising. Turkey’s
relations with Syria have deteriorated from Prime Minister Erdogan and
President Bashar enjoying holidays together to closing of the Turkish embassy
in Damascus. Turkey also is currently home to nearly 25,000
Syrians, a figure that is increasing every day, and has frequently voiced
the possibility of implementing buffer zones to protect the refugee camps along
its borders.
Equally, Saudi Arabia has been reported to be providing arms
and financial support to the Sunnis in Syria in their continuing uprising
against Bashar. The Sunni Arabs in Syria make up a majority in the country, and
such a majority rule would diminish Iran’s support base in the region. The Syrian
Muslim Brotherhood, which has close ties with Riyadh and Ankara, would dominate
rule post-regime – developments that worry Israel and Iran.
Now, the proxy wars have extended into Yemen and Bahrain. A recent
Guardian
article noted how the Hirak, a group of Yemeni secular activists, fighting
for secession of the south were offered training and arms by Iran. Tehran is
looking to get a foothold in the Gulf peninsula; the peninsula would allow
important trade channels through the region, and strategically powerful
positions to counter the Saudi influence. However, even some of the secular
activists within Yemen are resigned to the growing prominence of al-Qaeda in
the country. Saudi intelligence is strong in Yemen, and it is worth noting
their role in the recent foil of the ‘underwear bomber’ plot.
In Bahrain, with a Shia majority and historical connections
with Iran but ruled by a Sunni minority, is another piece in the Iran-Saudi
game. The recent social unrest in Bahrain towards the ruling elite has been met
with crackdown of civil liberties and State violence. Saudi Arabia has moved to
support the ruling al-Khalifa family, militarily intervening last spring in
Bahrain to suppress the uprising and forging ahead with a union of Persian Gulf
states. The Saudis are worried that the spirit of the uprising could force its
way across the border and disrupt their own fragile stability. Iran, meanwhile,
condemned the idea of the union and warned of instability if the unity plan was
to go ahead.
Across the region, the proxy war between Iran and Saudi
Arabia plays out. As with the US and Russia during the Cold War, the two
countries will fight their battles through other nations and their peoples,
hijacking the Arab Spring for a sectarian tussle and for fear of the spirit of
revolution reaching their lands – in the process creating instability and
uncertainty in an already troubled region.
2 comments:
It's pushing it a little to call the synchretic Allawites "an offshoot of Shiite Islam". The Allawite faith draws elements from both Christianity and Islam as well as elements of Greek philosophy. The Ayatollahs have acknowledged the Allawites as Shiites - but arguably they did this for political reasons.
I totally agree with you William
Post a Comment